This is a map of the different percentages of blacks in the Continental United States. By looking at the map, the highest percentage of the black population is located mainly in lower Texas, most of New Mexico and Southern California. There are areas in the population where there are little percentage of black people like in Montana and Ohio for example. It looks like mainly in the northern United States there are less black people. What everyone needs to look at though is the legend. Although it may look like there is a high percentage of blacks in on area, most counties are under 5 percent. There are really only 4 counties that are above 50% and these are the highest ones. Because the cut-off of the last category is 50%, in conclusion, most counties percentage of black people are less than half.
The percentage of Asians in the continental United States follows a somewhat similar trend as the percentage of Black people. However, the cut-off for the last category in this map is at 20 percent. All the counties with the darkest shade that look like there must be a lot of Asians in this area can be misinterpreted. Most of these counties in the 20-100% range are lower than 30%. Also important to note is the the most percentage of Asians per county can mostly be found in Hawaii and Alaska. Because they are not a part of the continental US, they are not mapped here. Honolulu county has the highest percent of Asian, at around 43%.
When taking census data, you are asked what race you are. Many people who choose "other" are people from Latin American descent, or Hispanic ethnicity. They chose other because they are not "white," "black," or "Asian." Therefore this trend looks very similar to the spread of Hispanics across the continental US. They are mainly found in Southern California and southern Texas. Also, it is important to note that this also includes all who choose "other" including people who identify themselves as Indian, Southeast Asian, or anything else that is not "white," "black," or "Asian."
The maps that were made were all using the data from the 2000 US Census and only the continental US was mapped. This obviously can cause a problem when showing data information for counties that matter in Hawaii and Alaska that show high percentages of Asians. However, for percentage of "Blacks" or "Other" it really does not matter, unless you would want to see how little the population percentage they are in those counties. In all three of the maps there was a noticeable trend and similarity. Most of the concentration of all the percentages were located in the Southwest mainly in California and Texas. California is generally known for being ethnically diverse in many ways and could be a main reason why there is a wide variety of races. Also, it makes sense that the Hispanics who choose "other" are located in the Southwest near Texas, New Mexico and California because Mexico is just across the border. Therefore, many Hispanics would live there. In conclusion, the maps look similar to each other because they really represent the ethnic diversity of the areas of the Southwest.
My overall impression of of GIS was satisfaction. I was very pleased with all of the lab activities and the course material. The material was not too difficult to understand and the lectures were organized. I loved doing the lab assignments because I thought they were fun and easy. However, when we began working with the ArcMap program, they were a bit more challenging. But I believe that a really good course has to challenge its students in order for them to learn. It was very frustrating at times, but so satisfying when I finally worked things out. I'm excited for the intermediate GIS course and further expanding my knowledge on the subject!











